Growing concerns of climatic extremes and the impacts of the subsidy of the Earth

Vox of the editors It is a blog from the AGU publications department.

TO Recent article in Geophysics reviews Explore drivers, rates and impacts of the earth’s survey worldwide. It also analyzes the need to improve processes representations and the inclusion of the interaction between the sinking of the earth and the climatic extremes, including its effects on risk models and evaluations. Here, we ask the main author to explain the concept of land sinking, its impacts and the future directions necessary for better mitigation.

What is the subsidence of the Earth?

The Subsidency of the Earth (LS) refers to the relative sinking or the decrease in the earth’s earth’s surface. LS is a pressing global problem that guarantees action since sinking can negatively affect infrastructure, humans and the environment in various landscapes and climates (Figure 1). It can be driven by one or more natural processes and/or human activities that are aggravated to cause localized or expansive soil deformation. The differential LS causes structures and roads to crack and open. LS can also reduce the water storage capacity of aquifers. In particular, LS can be recoverable (for example, natural variations in groundwater levels) or permanent (for example, overcome that causes irreversible compaction).

Why is it important to understand and monitor the sinking of the Earth?

There are several LS controllers and physical processes and interact with each other (Figure 1). It is often closely related to the demand for natural resources, which increases with the growing urbanization and megacities. The proximity of ls a critical infrastructure Like water transport, transport and public service systems, it is a significant concern, since LS could cause catastrophic life failures, interruptions and/or loss of lives. In addition, there are feedback between climatic extremes (for example, droughts, floods, forest fires, heat waves) and LS impacts, but are not completely understood.

Although a chronic danger, it can initially go unnoticed since the sinking generally occurs slowly. This influences the perceived risk and contributes to reactive policies, regulations and mitigation steps aimed at LS and its implications instead of proactive measures. In addition, the effects composed of extreme events and their impacts can exacerbate LS. It is likely that interactions with projected increases in climatic extremes are more pronounced.

How do scientists monitor and measure the sinking of the earth worldwide?

Scientists use various techniques and technologies to measure LS, including land surveys, subsurface instrumentation and satellite -based observations. The synthetic opening radar (SAR) based on satellite has revolutionized the monitoring and mapping of LS. It is an active remote detection system that emits microwave pulses and receives echoes. These systems can operate in various conditions (for example, day and night, in cloudy skies) and produce high resolution images. With SAR -based information, scientists can infer surface deformation when calculating phase differences between SAR snouts on a region using techniques such as interferometric (INSAR) SAR. SAR observations commonly report impact evaluations for agriculture, structural health and resource management.

What are the main natural and anthropogenic drivers of the sinking of the Earth?

Natural human processes and activities can independently boost LS or improve existing LS rates (Figure 2). Some examples of natural promoters of LS include: natural consolidation, volcanic or tectonic activity, seasonal variations of groundwater level and decomposition of the organic material of the soil. The extraction of natural resources (for example, fossil fuels, groundwater), the elimination of wetlands and basks, and the fast urbanization load serve as examples of activities related to humans that contribute to LS. The extraction of natural resources is a leading anthropogenic driver of LS (Figure 1), which often increases with the increase in population. In addition, extreme events such as forest fires or heat waves can trigger LS in permafrost areas defrosting the permafrost layer, altering the soil structure and releasing greenhouse gases that accelerate heating.

How is it projected that the sinking of the earth changes in the future?

Estimating future LS rates is challenging. Projecting human activities that promote LS and the effectiveness of restoration and mitigation efforts is complicated, uncertain and variable. LS projections also depend on other factors (for example, infrastructure investments, land use of land use changes). They are further complicated by uncertain projected hydrological variables such as precipitation. However, more people are expected to be exposed to LS with greater anticipated economic losses in the future.

The increase in sea level (SLR), growing temperatures and extreme events often aggravate ls. The coastal areas and the deltas in reduction face a greater risk of flooding of the SLR compound effect. The extreme events and impacts of LS are expected to be increasingly affected (figures 2-3) as the extremes (for example, drought) intensify with heating. In the midst of drought, groundwater levels decrease through a decreased recharge and an increase in pumping, which often leads to soil compaction and LS. As the soils dry and crack, the increased microbial processes decompose the organic matter of the soil and release carbon. These processes can improve heating while triggering LS and feedback. As temperatures increase, the LS driven by permafrost is also expected to expand, increasing infrastructure at risk of damage and failure.

What additional research, data or modeling are needed to help track and mitigate the sinking of the earth and its impacts?

Integrated models that incorporate multiple controllers and LS processes are necessary to estimate a better estimate of rates, extension and ramifications in space resolutions -Teason essential for mitigation, adaptation and politics. Additional data and research are needed to understand the interaction of extreme events, infrastructure, climatic trends and human activities with dynamics and LS effects (figure 3) and inform the mitigation efforts of LS.

Improved climate modeling, management practices and risk assessments require better representations for feedback of LS, carbon emissions and LS processes. Such advances require precise, longer and longer observations and analysis with a better process understanding. The global adoption of monitoring frameworks and consistent reports will also support such efforts to lead to a new vision of LS observations and regions at risk for improved floods with LS, etc. Interdisciplinary efforts will help transform science into actions focused on the risk of LS and risk mitigation.

—Laurie S. Huning ([email protected], 0000-0002-0296-4255), California State University, Long Beach, United States

Editor’s note: It is the policy of AGU publications inviting the authors of articles published in Reviews of Geophysics to write a summary for EOS ‘Vox editors.

Citation: HENING, LS (2025), increasing concerns of climatic extremes and the impacts of the earth’s survey, EOS, 106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025o255019. Posted on June 9, 2025.

This article does not represent AGU’s opinion, Eos, or any of its affiliates. It is only the author’s opinion (s).

Text © 2025. The authors. CC BY-NC -nd 3.0
Except when indicating otherwise, the images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission of the copyright owner is prohibited.

Related