Business cases are now promoting a more sophisticated vision of the adoption of the cloud, one that asks: move this system to the cloud makes commercial sense? Do long -term benefits are worth the costs of reengineering processes or redesign architecture? This pragmatic approach maximizes flexibility and minimizes the cloud supplier lock.
What the government needs to know
Like private organizations, many governments also adopted a first cloud policy with all my heart. However, it has become clear that an excessive cloud approach for all cases of use does not necessarily lead to success. The time for calculation has come, and both political and Government TI leaders recognize that intelligent decisions on the adoption of the cloud should be guided by commercial value instead of exaggeration. There I said it.
Governments have realized that simply demanding cloud migration is not a magical bullet. They must evaluate their portfolios of yourself by case, considering technical, financial and strategic factors. Many criteria should be evaluated before a workload is declared suitable for the cloud. Repatriation is common within government agencies, a normal response to transfer workloads and incorrect data to the cloud. Many of the workloads initially migrated to the cloud are too expensive to exist in a public cloud supplier and must return to other solutions, such as private clouds, traditional suppliers of administered services or placement suppliers.
#private #sector #teach #government #cloud #computing
