According Onwuegbuzie and Comink (2009)Appointment errors appear as the most common problem in academic manuscripts. Research authors in school manuscripts (RIS) demonstrated appointment errors in 91.8% of their presentations.
The educational researcher reported appointment errors of 88.6% in manuscripts presented for publication, according to Onwuegbuzie, combs, Frels and Slate (2011).
According Faunce and Job (2001), The analysis of five experimental psychology magazines revealed that 31.5% of the references included at least one error. Most of the errors in the appointments involved titles of incorrect articles (15%) and author names (12%), while also included page numbers (6%), volume numbers (3%) and magazine titles (2%).
The investigation carried out by Gatten (2010) He evaluated 217 fashion magazines in three magazines and found 49.3% of the inaccuracies in references. The analysis revealed that the title articles appeared as errors 48 times, while the names of the authors had 38 instances and the page numbers had 28 instances.
The investigation by Onwuegbuzie (2012) Through a meta -analysis, he showed that there were errors from the references list between 4.1% (New England Journal of Medicine) and 66.7% (British Journal of Obstetrics and Ginecology) in different fields of study.
#Avoid #citation #reference #errors
